10 Common Prompt Mistakes for AI Image Generation and How to Fix Them

The article lists ten frequent beginner errors when using GPT‑Image‑2—vague descriptions, over‑stacked style words, wrong aspect ratios, missing lighting, and more—each illustrated with a bad example, root cause, and a concrete repair template to dramatically improve image quality.

James' Growth Diary
James' Growth Diary
James' Growth Diary
10 Common Prompt Mistakes for AI Image Generation and How to Fix Them
Version used: gpt-image-2 (released April 2026)

01 | Vague Description

Bad example: 一个好看的咖啡馆场景 Good example:

俯拍视角,一张白色大理石圆桌,桌上摆着一杯拿铁拉花咖啡和一本翻开的书,背景是落地窗,下午三点的暖光从右侧斜射进来,摄影风格,浅景深

Root cause: The term “好看” provides no actionable information, causing the model to generate a generic, mediocre image.

Fix template:

[拍摄视角] + [主体描述] + [场景/背景] + [光线方向和类型] + [画面风格] + [景深/构图]

Example:

近景平视,一位穿白色衬衫的年轻女性坐在咖啡馆靠窗位置,桌上有笔记本电脑,窗外是模糊的街道,柔和的侧逆光,纪实摄影风格,浅景深

02 | Changing Too Many Variables at Once

Bad example: Change background to forest, protagonist to a boy, color to warm, and add a cat in a single request.

Good example: Modify only one variable per round, e.g., first change the background, then the protagonist, then the color.

Root cause: Simultaneous changes make the model compromise on all variables, and you cannot pinpoint which step caused an issue.

Fix template:

轮次1:把[元素A]从[旧值]改为[新值],其他不变
轮次2:在上图基础上,把[元素B]从[旧值]改为[新值],保持[A不变]
轮次3:...(每轮只动一个)

03 | Ignoring Aspect Ratio

Bad example: Generate a horizontal poster with the default 1024x1024 (square).

Good example: Specify size="1536x1024" for a horizontal layout or describe the desired composition in the prompt.

Root cause: Mismatched image ratio forces post‑generation cropping, breaking composition.

Fix template: Use the appropriate size for the target scenario.

公众号封面 – recommended size 1536x1024 (3:2) – 1536x1024 朋友圈竖图 – recommended size 1024x1536 (2:3) – 1024x1536 头像/图标 – square – 1024x1024 手机壁纸 – recommended size 1024x1792 (9:16) – 1024x1792 Also add a prompt note, e.g., “横版构图,左三分之一放主体,右侧留白用于放文字,画面比例 3:2”。

04 | Stacking Conflicting Style Words

Bad example:

赛博朋克风格,水彩画风格,极简主义,复古胶片,未来感,手绘插画风

Good example: Choose one primary style and up to two complementary modifiers.

Root cause: The model tries to fuse contradictory directions, resulting in an image with no clear style.

Fix template: [主风格],[辅助修饰1],[辅助修饰2] Recommended style combinations (excerpt):

主风格: 赛博朋克 – 辅助: 霓虹光效,雨夜 – 不推荐: 水彩、极简、手绘

主风格: 水彩插画 – 辅助: 柔和色调,纸质感 – 不推荐: 3D渲染、赛博朋克

主风格: 极简主义 – 辅助: 留白,几何,单色 – 不推荐: 复古、繁复花纹

主风格: 摄影写实 – 辅助: 自然光,浅景深 – 不推荐: 卡通、手绘线稿

05 | Prompt Length Too Long or Too Short

Bad (too long): 600‑word description with 20 detail requests.

Bad (too short): 一个人在城市里 (10 characters).

Good range: 80‑200 Chinese characters (or 50‑150 English words).

Root cause:

Too short: insufficient information, model fills randomly.

Too long: exceeds the model’s effective context window; later instructions receive little weight.

Fix template: Split the prompt into layers.

[核心层,20-40字] 主体 + 场景 + 风格
[细节层,30-80字] 光线 + 颜色 + 材质 + 构图
[约束层,10-30字] 不要什么 + 必须保留什么

Keep total length 100‑150 words; excess details should be moved to API parameters.

06 | Ignoring Lighting Description

Bad example: 一位女性站在户外,背景是树林 (no lighting info).

Good example:

一位女性站在户外树林边缘,黄昏时分,背后是逆光的橙色夕阳,轮廓光打亮发丝,面部补光,柔和阴影

Root cause: Lighting defines image texture; without it the model defaults to flat, generic lighting.

Fix template: Add scene‑specific lighting terms.

产品图 – 柔和漫射光,无阴影,纯白背景 人像 – 蝴蝶光,侧光,伦勃朗光,逆光轮廓 风景 – 黄金时刻,蓝调时刻,正午硬光 室内 –

窗口自然光,暖色台灯,霓虹灯环境光

07 | Not Using Negative Constraints

Bad example: 一张简洁的产品海报,手机放在白色桌面上 (no “不要” clause).

Good example: Append “不要 X,不要 Y,不要 Z” to the prompt.

Root cause: The model adds common but unwanted elements when not explicitly prohibited.

Fix template:

[正向描述]。不要[元素1],不要[元素2],不要[元素3],背景保持干净

Typical exclusion lists (excerpt):

产品图 – 多余道具、阴影过重、水印、反光

人像 – 多余人物、变形手指、奇怪背景

UI截图 – 多余弹窗、中文乱码、不一致字体

Logo – 多余装饰线、阴影、背景纹理

08 | Not Locking Invariant Elements During Iteration

Bad example: “把杯子颜色改成红色” without stating other elements stay the same, causing the whole scene to change.

Good example: “只把杯子颜色从白色改成深红色,桌面、背景、光线方向、其他所有元素严格保持不变”。

Root cause: GPT‑Image‑2’s local editing works only when unchanged parts are explicitly locked; otherwise the model performs global optimization.

Fix template:

在上图基础上,只修改[目标元素]的[具体属性]:
- 改变:[目标元素] 从 [原状态] 改为 [新状态]
- 严格保持不变:[锁定元素1]、[锁定元素2]、[锁定元素3]
- 光影方向、整体构图、色调完全不变

09 | Not Defining Character Traits in Multi‑Image Tasks

Bad example: Generating a comic series with only “a young girl”; each image shows a different face.

Good example: Include a fixed character description in every prompt.

Root cause: GPT‑Image‑2 lacks a persistent character ID; without repeated description it generates random appearances.

Fix template (character card):

# 角色固定描述(每张图都要包含)
角色:25岁亚洲女性,长直黑发,杏仁眼,圆脸,高挑身材,常穿白色T恤配牛仔裤

# 场景描述(每张图可以不同)
场景:[这张图的具体场景]

Store the character card as a variable and concatenate it into each prompt, e.g.:

CHARACTER = "25岁亚洲女性,长直黑发,杏仁眼,圆脸,高挑身材,常穿白色T恤配牛仔裤"
for scene in scenes:
    prompt = f"角色:{CHARACTER}。场景:{scene}"
    # call API

10 | Skipping Post‑Generation Quality Checks

Bad example: Look at the result once and either accept it or randomly tweak the prompt.

Good example: Use a standardized checklist to inspect each output and target fixes.

Root cause: Without a checklist you cannot locate deficiencies, leading to inefficient trial‑and‑error.

Quality‑check checklist:

□ 主体是否清晰,没有变形?
□ 光线方向是否一致,无矛盾光源?
□ 构图是否符合预期(画幅比例、主体位置)?
□ 风格是否统一,没有混搭冲突?
□ 细节(手指、文字、logo)是否正常?
□ 有没有出现不想要的元素?
□ 整体色调是否和使用场景匹配?

Each checklist item maps to a specific prompt‑repair direction.

描述类错误对比图
描述类错误对比图
光线与负向约束图
光线与负向约束图
10大错误速查清单图
10大错误速查清单图
Original Source

Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.

Sign in to view source
Republication Notice

This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactadmin@besthub.devand we will review it promptly.

Prompt EngineeringAI image generationcommon mistakesGPT Image 2repair templates
James' Growth Diary
Written by

James' Growth Diary

I am James, focusing on AI Agent learning and growth. I continuously update two series: “AI Agent Mastery Path,” which systematically outlines core theories and practices of agents, and “Claude Code Design Philosophy,” which deeply analyzes the design thinking behind top AI tools. Helping you build a solid foundation in the AI era.

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.