3,516 Top-Conference Figure 1 Examples: A Searchable Gallery for Paper Illustration Inspiration
The article introduces Top-Conf Figure Gallery, a static webpage collecting 3,516 Figure 1 images from six top AI conferences (2023–2026), filterable by conference, year, acceptance tier, and visual mode, plus FigureForge, an AI-assisted tool that uses these figures as references to generate draft illustrations for researchers' papers.
Writing a paper often stalls at Figure 1: the main illustration must convey the entire contribution at a glance, yet there is no standard template. The Top-Conf Figure Gallery solves this by providing a curated, searchable collection of Figure 1 images from ICLR, ICML, NeurIPS, CVPR, ACL, and AAAI (2023–2026).
What's Inside
The gallery contains 3,516 figures distributed as follows:
ICLR: 745
ICML: 748
NeurIPS: 966
CVPR: 308
ACL: 384
AAAI: 301
The lower CVPR count is explained: many CVPR Figure 1s are qualitative result walls or video frame strips, which were filtered out because they offer little layout reference. NeurIPS leads because its papers frequently use system-overview diagrams.
Each figure card shows conference, year, authors, original paper link, and a visual-mode tag. Filters include conference, year, acceptance level (Oral/Spotlight/Best with gold/silver/red badges), and visual mode. Full-text search works on title, author, and keywords (e.g., DPO, robot, gaussian, agent).
Visual Modes: What the Figure Is Doing
The most useful classification is the visual-mode tag, which describes the figure's visual function, not the paper's domain: conceptual — visual metaphor for core concept (e.g., DPO, Tree of Thoughts) framework — system or multi-agent module overview (e.g., HuggingGPT, MetaGPT) pipeline — end-to-end staged data flow architecture — model internal layers and tensor connections taxonomy — task, capability, or data classification panorama teaser — designed mixed text-image hero visual
If you need a multi-agent system overview, filter framework to see how peers arrange panels.
Curation Pipeline: Not Just Crawled
Figures were not simply scraped. A multi-stage pipeline ensured quality:
Machine pre-filter with 25+ rules to exclude: pure image collages, default matplotlib charts, unlabeled coordinate plots, text walls, full-page tables, software screenshots, result photo walls.
Perceptual hashing for deduplication.
Human page-by-page review: all candidate figures were arranged in 40-per-page contact sheets (81 pages total). Every page was inspected, removing ~1,400 unqualified crops.
The authors explain why human review was necessary: random sampling showed unqualified crops appeared across all score bands, so truncating low scores alone would not guarantee quality.
FigureForge: From Reference to Draft
FigureForge uses the gallery as a reference library for AI-assisted figure generation. The workflow:
Describe your paper — paste title and abstract, upload PDF (model reads overview, architecture, process, results), or write a one-sentence "input → method → output" summary.
Choose mode — framework for system overview, pipeline for end-to-end flow, architecture for model structure, conceptual for visual metaphor.
Select references — CLIP + BM25 hybrid retrieval over 3,500+ figures; each card shows relevance score. Two-stage mode requires ≥4 same-type references; direct mode 2–4.
Induce then generate — vision model first reads selected references, induces common layout, elements, color, hierarchy, picks representative exemplars, then generates the draft.
Download format — SVG (editable text, importable into Figma/draw.io/Illustrator) or bitmap (faithful layout for PPT/Figma verification).
The entire process runs locally in the browser; CLIP model and gallery index are bundled with the repo. Paper content and API keys never leave the device. Keys are sent only to the chosen provider (pre-configured: Volcano Ark, SiliconFlow, Zhipu, DeepSeek, OpenAI, Moonshot, Qwen, Tencent Hunyuan, Anthropic, plus any OpenAI-compatible proxy). The authors emphasize output is a high-quality draft for Figure 1 scenarios; text and numbers must be manually verified before submission.
How to Use
Easiest: open the GitHub Pages deployment. For local offline use:
git clone https://github.com/qwdwqfwq/topconf-paper-figure-gallery.git
cd topconf-paper-figure-gallery
python -m http.server 8000Or simply double-click index.html — all data is inlined in assets/figures.js, no network required.
The data pipeline is also open source: conference index → PDF download → Figure 1 crop → quality scoring → deduplication → human review. Scripts are in scripts/ for extending to other conferences.
Limitations and Copyright
Images cannot be reused directly; copyright belongs to original authors and publishers. The repo provides attribution index (title, all authors, paper link) for educational/research use. A 72-hour takedown policy honors rights-holder requests.
Figure count differences do not reflect conference quality; CVPR's low count stems from its result-wall Figure 1s being filtered out.
FigureForge is beta: output is a draft, not final. Text/numbers need manual check. Hunyuan and Anthropic require a proxy due to browser CORS restrictions.
Core Value
Academia lacks a path to surface good design. Top-conference Figure 1s often represent days of polishing, yet that design experience stays buried in proceedings. This project makes 3,500+ figures searchable, tagged, and categorized — turning tacit design knowledge into retrievable material. Additionally, the open-sourced pipeline demonstrates how to systematically collect and curate design assets, a reference for research-tool builders.
GitHub:
https://github.com/qwdwqfwq/topconf-paper-figure-gallerySigned-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.
This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactand we will review it promptly.
Geek Labs
Daily shares of interesting GitHub open-source projects. AI tools, automation gems, technical tutorials, open-source inspiration.
How this landed with the community
Was this worth your time?
0 Comments
Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.
