Fundamentals 6 min read

Comparing Merge, Rebase, and Squash Methods for Pull Requests

This article explains the three common Git pull‑request merge strategies—Merge, Rebase, and Squash—detailing their advantages, disadvantages, and suitable scenarios, and provides practical recommendations for developers to choose the appropriate method when integrating code changes.

DevOps
DevOps
DevOps
Comparing Merge, Rebase, and Squash Methods for Pull Requests

SmartIDE is an open‑source cloud‑native IDE developed by a community of developers, aiming to give developers "cloud‑native superpowers" with a single command smartide start , supporting multiple languages (Java, .NET, JavaScript, Go, Python, PHP, C/C++) and IDEs (VSCode, JetBrains) across Windows, macOS, and Linux.

Most Git hosting platforms provide three pull‑request merge options—Merge, Rebase, and Squash. This article compares these methods to help developers understand their differences and choose the right one.

Different PR merge methods and their pros/cons

Merge (No Fast‑forward): creates a separate merge commit and retains all commits from the source branch.

Rebase: rewrites the source branch commits onto the target branch without creating a separate merge commit.

Squash: compresses all source branch commits into a single commit before merging.

Merge

Rebase

Squash

Preserve original branch history

Yes

Yes

No

Create independent commit record

Yes

No

Yes

Remove sensitive information

No

No

Yes

Rewrite target branch history

No

Yes

No

Linearity of history

Low

High

High

Number of history entries

Many

Medium

Few

Three illustrative images show the visual differences: Image 1 demonstrates that Merge retains both the original branch commits and the merge commit; Image 2 shows Rebase exposing only the original branch history; Image 3 shows Squash keeping only a single merged commit while discarding the original branch history.

General recommendations:

When the purpose of a PR is to keep a complete, auditable record, Merge or Squash (both create a distinct merge commit) are preferable to Rebase.

If sensitive information was accidentally committed, Squash can remove that history at the cost of losing the original branch’s detailed commit log.

Based on these points, the article suggests using Merge by default to preserve history, but switching to Squash when the source branch contains sensitive data that must be eliminated.

References:

Why I’m against merging pull requests in squash mode or rebase mode?

What’s the Difference Between the 3 Github Merge Methods?

#IDCF DevOps Hackathon Challenge – an end‑to‑end DevOps experience combining lean startup, agile development, and pipeline automation, held in Dalian, August 6‑7, 2022.

software developmentgitversion controlMerge Methodspull request
DevOps
Written by

DevOps

Share premium content and events on trends, applications, and practices in development efficiency, AI and related technologies. The IDCF International DevOps Coach Federation trains end‑to‑end development‑efficiency talent, linking high‑performance organizations and individuals to achieve excellence.

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

login Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.