Fix Critical Spring Framework CVE-2024-38808 & CVE-2024-38809

Spring Framework versions up to 5.3.38 and certain Spring Boot releases contain two severe DoS vulnerabilities (CVE-2024-38808 and CVE-2024-38809); this guide explains their impact, affected products, and provides detailed mitigation steps, including version upgrades and configuration changes to secure your applications.

Java Architecture Diary
Java Architecture Diary
Java Architecture Diary
Fix Critical Spring Framework CVE-2024-38808 & CVE-2024-38809

Spring Framework recently disclosed two serious security vulnerabilities, CVE-2024-38808 and CVE-2024-38809, both capable of causing denial‑of‑service (DoS) attacks. This article details their impact, affected versions, and remediation methods for Spring Boot 2.x projects.

1. CVE-2024-38808 Vulnerability Analysis

1.1 Description

In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 to 5.3.38 (and earlier unsupported releases), evaluating user‑provided SpEL (Spring Expression Language) expressions can be exploited to trigger a DoS attack.

1.2 Affected Products and Versions

Spring Framework: 5.3.0 – 5.3.38 and earlier

Spring Boot: 2.7.x – 2.7.18 and earlier

1.3 Mitigation

Upgrade affected installations to the following fixed versions:

Spring Framework 5.3.x → 5.3.39 (or migrate to 6.0+)

If it is impossible to completely avoid user‑provided SpEL, use SimpleEvaluationContext.forReadOnlyDataBinding for read‑only expression evaluation.

2. CVE-2024-38809 Vulnerability Analysis

2.1 Description

Parsing the HTTP request headers "If‑Match" or "If‑None‑Match" ETag can be abused to cause a DoS attack.

2.2 Affected Products and Versions

Spring Framework: 6.1.0 – 6.1.11, 6.0.0 – 6.0.22, 5.3.0 – 5.3.37 and earlier

Spring Boot: 3.1.0 – 3.1.12, 3.0.0 – 3.0.13, 2.7.x – 2.7.18 and earlier

2.3 Mitigation

Upgrade to the following fixed versions:

6.1.x → 6.1.12

6.0.x → 6.0.23

5.3.x → 5.3.38

If an immediate upgrade is not feasible, configure Filter to limit the size of "If‑Match" and "If‑None‑Match" headers, reducing the attack surface.

3. How to Patch Vulnerabilities in Spring Boot 2.x Projects

3.1 Add spring-framework-bom Dependency

Insert the following dependency management into pom.xml:

<dependencyManagement>
    <dependencies>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
            <artifactId>spring-framework-bom</artifactId>
            <version>5.3.39</version>
            <type>pom</type>
            <scope>import</scope>
        </dependency>
        <!-- other dependencies -->
    </dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
Note: Place spring-framework-bom at the top of the dependency‑management section so Maven resolves it correctly.

3.2 Verify Dependency Versions

Refresh Maven dependencies to ensure the Spring Framework version is updated to 5.3.39 or later.

Dependency version verification
Dependency version verification

3.3 Check Spring EL Usage

For features that evaluate SpEL expressions (custom rate‑limiting annotations, permission checks, caching, etc.), ensure they do not process user‑provided input, or employ SimpleEvaluationContext.forReadOnlyDataBinding to create a read‑only context.

Conclusion

Given the widespread use of Spring Framework, timely updates and patches are crucial for system security. This guide equips developers with the steps needed to mitigate the risks of CVE‑2024‑38808 and CVE‑2024‑38809, ensuring safer Spring Boot applications.

Original Source

Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.

Sign in to view source
Republication Notice

This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactadmin@besthub.devand we will review it promptly.

backend-developmentSecurity PatchSpring FrameworkDoSCVE-2024-38808CVE-2024-38809
Java Architecture Diary
Written by

Java Architecture Diary

Committed to sharing original, high‑quality technical articles; no fluff or promotional content.

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.