Operations 28 min read
How Do Projects Achieve High Availability Without Multi‑Site Active‑Active? – A Meituan Interview Question
The article analyzes high‑availability concepts, from single‑machine risks to multi‑site active‑active architectures, compares cold and hot backup strategies, discusses network latency challenges, and presents Ele.me’s cell‑based, sharding‑driven multi‑region solution with concrete examples, tables, and code snippets.
Tech Freedom Circle
Tech Freedom Circle
Latency Comparison (Beijing‑Shanghai vs. Intra‑DC)
L1 cache reference ......................... 0.5 ns
Branch mispredict ............................ 5 ns
L2 cache reference ........................... 7 ns
Mutex lock/unlock ........................... 25 ns
Main memory reference ...................... 100 ns
Compress 1K bytes with Zippy ............. 3,000 ns = 3 µs
Send 2K bytes over 1 Gbps network ....... 20,000 ns = 20 µs
SSD random read ........................ 150,000 ns = 150 µs
Read 1 MB sequentially from memory ..... 250,000 ns = 250 µs
Round trip within same datacenter ...... 500,000 ns = 0.5 ms
Read 1 MB sequentially from SSD* ..... 1,000,000 ns = 1 ms
Shanghai intra‑city network latency........ 1,000,000 ns = 1 ms
Disk seek ........................... 10,000,000 ns = 10 ms
Read 1 MB sequentially from disk .... 20,000,000 ns = 20 ms
Beijing‑Shanghai network latency.................... 30,000,000 ns = 30 ms
Send packet CA‑>Netherlands‑>CA .... 150,000,000 ns = 150 msWritten by
Tech Freedom Circle
Crazy Maker Circle (Tech Freedom Architecture Circle): a community of tech enthusiasts, experts, and high‑performance fans. Many top‑level masters, architects, and hobbyists have achieved tech freedom; another wave of go‑getters are hustling hard toward tech freedom.
0 followers
Reader feedback
How this landed with the community
Rate this article
Was this worth your time?
Discussion
0 Comments
Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.
