How UI Patterns Influence User Retention Across Similar Apps

This article examines how users compare and switch between multiple apps of the same type—such as video, social, and real‑estate platforms—highlighting the impact of consistent UI patterns, reading modes, and filter designs on user comfort, cognitive load, and overall retention.

FangDuoduo UEDC
FangDuoduo UEDC
FangDuoduo UEDC
How UI Patterns Influence User Retention Across Similar Apps

In a crowded market where many apps serve similar functions—video, social, real‑estate—users often use several products of the same type and subconsciously compare them on service, features, operation, details, experience, and interface.

Designs that match user scenarios and provide high‑quality service increase comfort, user stickiness, and activity, which explains why many apps share similar UI patterns. These commonalities lower the operation threshold, create user habits, and make switching between apps easier.

1. Bilibili Comics

Bilibili’s comic reader offers multiple reading modes: a vertical “scroll” mode for efficient reading, a conventional left‑to‑right “normal” mode, and a right‑to‑left “Japanese manga” mode. Each mode’s arrow icon clearly indicates the page‑turn direction, preventing confusion when users switch modes and respecting diverse reading habits.

Bilibili comic reading modes
Bilibili comic reading modes

2. B2B SaaS Real‑Estate Listing Pages

Enterprise (B‑side) products have relatively fixed users who rarely use multiple competing systems, but they do switch from one product to another. The “previous” product’s advantages or habits influence expectations for the “current” product, so respecting those habits smooths the transition.

For real‑estate agents, list‑filter design aims to improve house‑search efficiency. Agents are familiar with the interface and need to narrow targets quickly, so B‑side list filters differ from consumer‑facing (C‑side) filters, which allocate more space to display listings.

Previous product list
Previous product list
Current product list
Current product list

Comparisons of various apps (e.g., Fangyou, Haofang, QiaoFang, Duoduo Maifang) show trade‑offs between filter space and listing density. After redesign, Duoduo Maifang reduced filter clutter, highlighted frequent actions, and displayed more listings per screen, easing the switch for users coming from other systems.

3. Oasis vs. Instagram

Oasis, a Chinese “Instagram‑like” social app, launched with an invitation‑only beta and quickly attracted attention. However, its heavy use of text‑less buttons confused users unfamiliar with the interface, increasing cognitive load and lowering conversion rates. Consistent naming and familiar icons are essential to reduce this load.

Instagram screenshot
Instagram screenshot
Oasis screenshot
Oasis screenshot

In summary, blindly copying competitors is insufficient. Analyzing user behavior and context, respecting user cognition, and adding distinctive features are key to retaining users.

user experienceProduct ManagementUI designmobile appsapp comparison
FangDuoduo UEDC
Written by

FangDuoduo UEDC

FangDuoduo UEDC, officially the FangDuoduo User Experience Design Center. It handles UX design for FangDuoduo’s suite of products and focuses on pioneering experience innovation in the online real‑estate sector.

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.