Big Data 17 min read

Kuaishou Data Lake Construction with Apache Hudi: Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions

This article explains why Kuaishou built a data lake, outlines the shortcomings of its previous Lambda architecture, describes the adoption of Apache Hudi for unified batch‑stream processing, and details the five major technical challenges and the corresponding solutions implemented to improve performance, consistency, and operational reliability.

DataFunSummit
DataFunSummit
DataFunSummit
Kuaishou Data Lake Construction with Apache Hudi: Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions

Kuaishou built a data lake to achieve the core goals of standardized, shareable, simple, high‑performance, and reliable data infrastructure, moving away from a traditional Lambda architecture that suffered from latency, heterogeneous processing logic, and data silos.

The chosen solution is Apache Hudi, which offers massive storage, schema evolution, extensible data types, strong data management, and high‑performance analytics, supporting both streaming and batch workloads.

Key challenges addressed include:

Ingestion bottlenecks caused by uneven bucket distribution and back‑pressure; solved by stream‑style writes, dynamic load balancing, and automatic partition publishing.

Inability to query snapshots by data time; solved by adding time‑version metadata to Hudi's Time Travel feature.

Flink‑on‑Hudi update bottlenecks due to resource mismatches; solved by separating operations, enabling parallel execution, and using appropriate indexing strategies.

Insufficient multi‑task merge capability; solved by logical bucketing and schema‑aware merge planning.

Production‑grade assurance difficulties; solved by configuration simplification, consistency checks, and enhanced metrics for stability.

Practical case studies demonstrate significant improvements: real‑time DWD generation with >50% latency reduction, snapshot query latency cut from hours to minutes with 15% resource savings, and streamlined retention table updates achieving 50% faster processing.

Future plans aim to enrich metadata services, support real‑time tables, achieve seamless migration from existing pipelines, and deliver a unified stream‑batch data production and query platform.

Original Source

Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.

Sign in to view source
Republication Notice

This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactadmin@besthub.devand we will review it promptly.

Big DataReal-time ProcessingFlinkData LakeData ArchitectureApache Hudi
DataFunSummit
Written by

DataFunSummit

Official account of the DataFun community, dedicated to sharing big data and AI industry summit news and speaker talks, with regular downloadable resource packs.

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.