Fundamentals 3 min read

Linus Torvalds Criticizes Google Contributor Over Inode Usage

Linus Torvalds blasted a Google contributor’s proposal to make all file and directory inodes identical, calling the idea outdated, labeling the pull request as garbage, and urging that the inode concept be abandoned in favor of modern file‑system designs that no longer rely on unique identifiers.

Java Tech Enthusiast
Java Tech Enthusiast
Java Tech Enthusiast
Linus Torvalds Criticizes Google Contributor Over Inode Usage

Linus Torvalds recently posted one of his most forceful messages on the Linux kernel mailing list, harshly criticizing a Google contributor’s suggestion to make all inodes for files and directories identical.

He argued that inodes are an outdated concept and should no longer be treated as unique identifiers, stating that modern file systems have evolved beyond the 1970s design.

Google engineer Steven Rostedt proposed assigning unique numbers to inodes, but Linus responded that the inode mechanism should be abandoned to avoid unnecessary complexity.

When Rostedt submitted a pull request, Linus labeled the code as “garbage” and warned against copying functions without understanding their purpose.

Reference: https://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2401.3/04208.html

Original Source

Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.

Sign in to view source
Republication Notice

This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactadmin@besthub.devand we will review it promptly.

kernelLinuxOpenSourceinodeSoftwareEngineering
Java Tech Enthusiast
Written by

Java Tech Enthusiast

Sharing computer programming language knowledge, focusing on Java fundamentals, data structures, related tools, Spring Cloud, IntelliJ IDEA... Book giveaways, red‑packet rewards and other perks await!

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.