Linus Torvalds Says Linux Won’t Ban AI – Fork or Leave If You Disagree
Linus Torvalds reiterated that the Linux kernel is not an anti‑AI project, urging dissenters to either fork their own version or leave, while acknowledging AI’s practical value, the ongoing community debate, and the broader concerns about licensing, energy use and code quality.
Developers have debated whether large‑language‑model (LLM) tools should be allowed in open‑source projects because AI can generate low‑quality code, buggy bug reports, and increase maintainer workload—a phenomenon referred to as “Vibe Coding”.
The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) issued a set of recommendations on AI and LLM use in open‑source projects, prompting further discussion.
In March 2024 the AI‑based patch‑review tool Sashiko began regular participation in upstream Linux kernel reviews and was accepted by several core maintainers, which many developers saw as a milestone for AI entering the kernel development workflow.
“Linux is not an anti‑AI project. If anyone objects, they can fork their own version or simply leave.”
Linus Torvalds responded on the Linux kernel mailing list, stating that the kernel will not force developers to use AI but will not reject a tool that has proven useful. He likened AI to other developer tools such as Git, GCC, and debuggers, saying it is simply another tool in the toolbox.
Torvalds noted a shift from his earlier view (approximately a year ago) that “90 % of AI is hype” to a current position that AI has demonstrated practical value in kernel development.
Unresolved technical concerns
Training and inference costs may be unsustainable.
Models are often trained on unlicensed code and internet data, raising copyright and GPL‑compliance questions.
AI data‑center energy consumption has environmental impact.
Developers may become overly dependent on AI, potentially degrading code quality.
Observed problems in practice
AI‑generated content increases reviewers’ workload.
Occasional bugs and “hallucinations” appear in AI output.
Concerns about copyright violations, GPL compliance, energy use, and possible job displacement.
Torvalds criticized opponents who “bury their heads in the sand” and urged that LLM tools should genuinely help maintainers rather than add to their burden.
He reiterated that the Linux project exists to advance technology, not to serve as a social or political platform, and that decisions should be based on technical merit rather than fear of new tools.
Community reactions remain split: some developers point to a growing amount of high‑quality software produced with AI assistance, while others remain skeptical about licensing, energy consumption, and long‑term impacts.
References:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-Is-Not-Anti-AI
https://www.theregister.com/ai-and-ml/2026/07/15/linus-torvalds-tells-ai-haters-to-fork-off
Code example
往
期
推
荐
1、
谷歌刚砍掉的这功能,让你的浏览器广告变多了
2、
为什么网址里要写两个斜杠?
3、
面试官坏笑:“GPT-5.6 刚发布,比 Claude 5 和 Grok 4.5 强吗?” 我怒骂:“现场给你测试是吧?”
4、
原神是用什么编程语言开发的?
5、
互联网巨头决定抛弃Git......
点
分
享
点
收
藏
点
点
赞
点在看Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.
This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactand we will review it promptly.
Java Tech Enthusiast
Sharing computer programming language knowledge, focusing on Java fundamentals, data structures, related tools, Spring Cloud, IntelliJ IDEA... Book giveaways, red‑packet rewards and other perks await!
How this landed with the community
Was this worth your time?
0 Comments
Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.
