Live Streaming Co‑Streaming (连麦) Process, Performance Metrics, and Test Scenarios
The article explains the rapid development of live streaming co‑streaming (连麦), outlines its interaction workflow, defines key quality indicators such as latency, sync, stutter and resolution, and details comprehensive test scenarios covering device, network, UI and user‑side compatibility.
Since 2016, live streaming has grown quickly, offering strong interactivity and immediacy that surpass traditional TV; users experience a heightened sense of presence through gifts and comments. The interaction model has evolved from one‑way host‑to‑audience streams to multi‑party real‑time audio‑video collaborations.
Co‑streaming (连麦) workflow:
1. The host starts a normal live broadcast, and regular viewers see the single‑host video. 2. Viewers who want to co‑stream submit a request, which appears in a co‑stream request list. 3. The host selects one or more viewers from the list, initiates a real‑time audio‑video session, and the system generates a composite picture containing both host and guests. 4. All viewers see the composite picture. 5. When co‑streaming ends, the broadcast returns to the single‑host view.
Co‑streaming quality indicators:
Low latency – the time difference between capture on the host side and playback on the viewer side; low latency is essential for smooth interaction.
Audio‑video sync – mismatches between sound and picture degrade the viewing experience.
Stutter rate – a frame interval exceeding 400‑600 ms is considered a stutter.
Picture quality – clarity depends on resolution and bitrate; higher bitrate yields clearer images at a given resolution.
Performance metrics specific to streaming SDKs:
• Video clarity is affected by bitrate, frame rate, and resolution. • Video smoothness is affected by bitrate and frame rate. • Additional considerations include traffic consumption and power usage.
User‑scenario testing:
1. Device compatibility – Android hosts accept Android/iOS guests, iOS hosts accept Android/iOS guests, and version compatibility is verified. 2. Network compatibility – test under various packet loss and bandwidth limits, across regions, carriers, and mobile data types; verify behavior during Wi‑Fi ↔ 3G/4G switches and after network loss/recovery. 3. Device model adaptation – handle different resolutions, OS versions, and hardware. 4. Interrupt handling – ensure co‑streaming continues despite phone calls, ear‑phone plug/unplug, foreground/background switches, volume changes, or screen lock. 5. Orientation testing – verify that portrait/landscape mixes do not stretch the video. 6. Viewer‑side scenarios – check latency and sync when a viewer’s view switches before, during, and after co‑streaming. 7. Playback verification – ensure that pre‑co‑stream playback works and that playback of the co‑stream segment is reliable.
Qtest, the professional testing team of 360, promotes testing technology on the web platform and encourages readers to follow their QR code for more updates.
Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.
This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactand we will review it promptly.
360 Quality & Efficiency
360 Quality & Efficiency focuses on seamlessly integrating quality and efficiency in R&D, sharing 360’s internal best practices with industry peers to foster collaboration among Chinese enterprises and drive greater efficiency value.
How this landed with the community
Was this worth your time?
0 Comments
Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.
