Measuring Income Inequality: Gini, Theil, Hoover & Atkinson Indices
This article introduces four common inequality measurement indices—Gini, Theil, Hoover, and Atkinson—explains their formulas and interpretation, demonstrates calculations using a hypothetical village’s income distribution, and presents comparative data from G20 countries to illustrate how these metrics assess income fairness.
In modern society, discussions of fairness and unfairness arise frequently in education, income, and resource allocation, prompting the need for quantitative measures. This article examines four widely used inequality measurement indices.
Gini Index
The Gini Index measures income or wealth inequality using the Lorenz curve. Its value ranges from 0 (perfect equality) to 1 (perfect inequality). If everyone earns the same amount, the index is 0; if one person holds all income, the index is 1.
Theil Index
The Theil Index is an entropy‑based measure of distribution inequality. It captures both the magnitude of income gaps and the entropy of the income distribution.
Hoover Index
The Hoover (Robin Hood) Index quantifies the proportion of total income that would need to be redistributed to achieve perfect equality. Its value also lies between 0 and 1.
Atkinson Index
The Atkinson Index measures the welfare loss caused by inequality, using a sensitivity parameter that reflects how much weight is given to low‑income individuals; larger values indicate higher sensitivity to low incomes.
Using a hypothetical village with four households earning 5,000, 10,000, 20,000, and 100,000 yuan, the calculated indices are:
Gini Index: 0.1371
Theil Index: 0.0320
Hoover Index: 0.1129
Atkinson Index: 0.0164
These values indicate a modest level of income inequality. A comparative table of G20 countries shows how these indices vary across nations.
Overall, the four indices provide a comprehensive toolkit for evaluating income distribution and its impact on social welfare.
Model Perspective
Insights, knowledge, and enjoyment from a mathematical modeling researcher and educator. Hosted by Haihua Wang, a modeling instructor and author of "Clever Use of Chat for Mathematical Modeling", "Modeling: The Mathematics of Thinking", "Mathematical Modeling Practice: A Hands‑On Guide to Competitions", and co‑author of "Mathematical Modeling: Teaching Design and Cases".
How this landed with the community
Was this worth your time?
0 Comments
Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.