Trae China SOLO Goes Free—But the Same Queue Issues Resurface
After Trae announced a free rollout of its China‑version SOLO model, the author discovered the feature unlocked, tested GLM‑4.7 and Doubao‑Seed‑Code, hit long queues and missing fireworks, then compared results with the international version using Gemini 3 Pro, highlighting capability differences and trade‑offs.
Trae announced that the China‑version SOLO mode would be free for all users before 2025‑12‑25 , but a subsequent “resource coordination” notice delayed the rollout, leaving many developers disappointed.
After upgrading the client, the author found the SOLO mode silently unlocked and confirmed with several developer friends that it was usable.
The model selection screen displayed the promised domestic large models—Doubao‑Seed‑Code, GLM‑4.7, MiniMax‑M2.1—each available at no cost.
To test the free service, the author set a challenge: build a 2026 New Year webpage where fireworks could be controlled by hand gestures. Based on prior evaluations claiming code ability comparable to GPT‑5, GLM‑4.7 was chosen and the prompt was submitted.
The response included a queue notice placing the request at position 201, echoing the experience of the earlier international release. Switching to Doubao‑Seed‑Code yielded a much faster, smooth code generation, but the preview rendered a black screen with no fireworks, no gesture control, and no camera permission request.
Repeating the same prompt on the Trae international version, which uses Google’s Gemini 3 Pro , produced the expected fireworks effect and allowed hand‑gesture toggling of text dispersion and aggregation.
The author concludes that the underlying model capability, rather than the IDE itself, drives the experience. If possible, the international version is recommended for better performance; the domestic free version works but may require extra debugging, reflecting the cost of a free service.
Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.
This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactand we will review it promptly.
How this landed with the community
Was this worth your time?
0 Comments
Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.
