VINCIE-NExT: Transferring Image Editing to Video via Keyframe Guidance
ByteDance Seed team's VINCIE-NExT transfers image editing to video by editing keyframes and using them as visual references, achieving 3.08 on OpenVE-Bench with TDF3D-RoPE positional encoding and Chain-of-Editing inference, though camera viewpoint edits remain challenging.
The paper VINCIE-NExT: Unlocking Video Editing from Images via In-Context Modeling from ByteDance Seed (led by Zeng Yan, Seedance 2.0 pretraining lead) introduces a framework that leverages mature image editing capabilities for video editing. The core idea is a video→image→edited image→video pipeline: extract keyframes from the source video, edit them with an image editor guided by user instructions, then feed the edited keyframes as visual references to a unified image-video model that generates the full edited video.
Methodology
To propagate keyframe edits consistently across frames, the authors propose TDF3D-RoPE (Temporal Dual-Frequency 3D Rotary Positional Encoding). This encoding simultaneously captures sequential relationships between visual segments and spatial correspondences within segments, allowing the model to distinguish original vs. edited images and align corresponding regions.
Inference uses a Chain-of-Editing (CoE) strategy: Stage 1 generates the edited keyframe; Stage 2 uses that keyframe as a visual exemplar to generate the complete video. Both stages share the same model parameters.
Training Data Composition
The model is trained on three data mixtures:
Image editing data: 1.2M samples
Video editing data: 2.45M samples
Video–original keyframe–edited keyframe triplets: 1.63M samples constructed by prompting GPT-4o for edit instructions and applying Seedream 4.5 to sampled video frames.
This design reduces reliance on fully paired source video–instruction–target video data, though video editing data still participates in training.
Evaluation on OpenVE-Bench
OpenVE-Bench contains 431 videos across 8 task categories (global style transfer, background change, local edit, object removal, object addition, subtitle edit, creative edit, camera viewpoint edit). Scoring uses Gemini 2.5 Pro (1–5 scale).
Overall score: VINCIE-NExT 3.08 vs. OpenVE-Edit 2.49 (~24% relative improvement).
Per-task highlights:
Global style transfer: 4.17 (beats Runway Aleph 3.72)
Local object removal: 3.24 (vs. OpenVE-Edit 1.85)
Camera viewpoint edit: 2.06 (well below Runway Aleph 4.53)
The authors note that viewpoint changes require new geometry reasoning beyond appearance transfer, and tasks needing novel content generation (background change, object addition) still have room for improvement.
Qualitative Analysis & Modularity
Visualizations show successful global style conversions and combined local edits (fire, water, wind) while preserving temporal coherence. Ablations compare direct video-to-video editing, CoE with model-generated keyframes, and CoE with external image editor keyframes. Direct video-to-video produces flickering/ghosting; edited keyframes act as visual anchors that mitigate these artifacts. Plugging in a stronger external image editor improves results without retraining the video model, demonstrating the framework's modularity.
Limitations & Conclusion
VINCIE-NExT establishes a viable path for transferring image editing to video via keyframe guidance, unified image-video modeling, specialized positional encoding, and staged inference. It excels at style changes and local edits but struggles with camera viewpoint shifts, complex geometric transformations, and generating entirely new scene content. The paper was accepted at NeurIPS 2026 and posted on arXiv on October 8.
Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.
This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactand we will review it promptly.
SmartApe AI
SmartApe's AI technology content account, focusing on cutting-edge AI developments and open-source frontlines.
How this landed with the community
Was this worth your time?
0 Comments
Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.
