Operations 12 min read

Why I Switched from Ubuntu to Manjaro – Speed, Rolling Releases, and Simpler Package Management

After a decade of using Ubuntu, the author migrated to Manjaro because it feels faster, runs fewer background services, offers a rolling‑release model, and provides a cleaner, more flexible package management system, making the overall Linux experience more efficient and enjoyable.

Liangxu Linux
Liangxu Linux
Liangxu Linux
Why I Switched from Ubuntu to Manjaro – Speed, Rolling Releases, and Simpler Package Management

Background and Motivation

The author had been using Ubuntu for more than ten years but recently changed to Manjaro, citing better performance, a leaner system, and a different release philosophy.

Performance Comparison

Testing in VirtualBox showed that Manjaro feels as fast as a fresh Ubuntu install, which matters when compiling large codebases. A key factor is the number of enabled services: Ubuntu runs about 90 enabled units, while Manjaro runs only 24.

systemctl list-unit-files --state=enabled --no-pager

Images of the service lists illustrate the disparity.

Release Models: Fixed vs Rolling

Ubuntu follows a twice‑yearly fixed‑release schedule, delivering a new version every April and October. Manjaro adopts a rolling‑release model, continuously updating packages after they pass testing, which avoids large version jumps but can sacrifice stability.

Package Management

Ubuntu relies on apt and .deb packages, with many third‑party applications offering .deb files. However, managing Personal Package Archives (PPAs) can be cumbersome, especially during upgrades or reinstallations.

Manjaro uses pacman and provides access to the Arch User Repository (AUR), offering a vast collection of up‑to‑date software with simpler management.

System Design and User Experience

Manjaro inherits Arch’s principles, delivering a lightweight base system that lets users choose which applications to install. In contrast, Ubuntu ships with a broader set of pre‑installed apps, resembling a fully equipped RV versus a stripped‑down go‑kart.

While Arch can be extremely minimal, Manjaro balances simplicity with usability, avoiding the need for extensive manual configuration.

Key Takeaways

Manjaro feels faster and less bloated.

It uses a rolling‑release model that provides timely updates.

Package management is straightforward, with pacman and AUR.

These observations are subjective but highlight why some users may prefer Manjaro over Ubuntu for a more responsive and flexible Linux experience.

system performancePackage ManagementUbuntuRolling ReleaseDistribution ComparisonManjaro
Liangxu Linux
Written by

Liangxu Linux

Liangxu, a self‑taught IT professional now working as a Linux development engineer at a Fortune 500 multinational, shares extensive Linux knowledge—fundamentals, applications, tools, plus Git, databases, Raspberry Pi, etc. (Reply “Linux” to receive essential resources.)

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.