Why IBM Urges New US Export Controls on Facial Recognition Technology
IBM calls on the U.S. Commerce Department to impose stricter export restrictions on advanced facial‑recognition systems that could enable mass surveillance or human‑rights abuses by authoritarian regimes, highlighting recent policy discussions and the company's own shift away from such technology.
IBM said on Friday that the U.S. Department of Commerce should adopt new export controls to limit facial‑recognition systems that could be used by authoritarian regimes to violate human rights.
The company’s statement calls for restrictions on “one‑to‑many” facial‑recognition systems capable of mass surveillance or targeting dissenters, rather than focusing on consumer devices such as iPhone unlock features.
Earlier this year, the Commerce Department sought public comment on whether to require export licenses for surveillance‑related facial‑recognition software and biometric systems, with a deadline of 15 September.
IBM’s vice‑president of government and regulatory affairs, Christopher Padilla, told Reuters that the U.S. should concentrate on high‑risk, large‑scale systems and also limit the export of high‑resolution cameras, image‑matching algorithms, and access to online image databases used to train such systems.
The company noted that the Commerce Department has already placed dozens of Chinese firms, including Hikvision, SenseTime and Megvii, on an economic blacklist, and IBM itself announced in June that it will cease providing facial‑recognition software and oppose its use for mass surveillance and racial profiling, urging new federal regulations to hold police accountable for misuse.
Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.
This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactand we will review it promptly.
Programmer DD
A tinkering programmer and author of "Spring Cloud Microservices in Action"
How this landed with the community
Was this worth your time?
0 Comments
Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.
