Why MySQL Discourages UUIDs and Non‑Sequential IDs: Performance Comparison with Auto‑Increment Primary Keys
This article analyzes MySQL's recommendation against UUIDs and non‑sequential keys by benchmarking three tables—auto‑increment, UUID, and random snowflake IDs—using a Spring Boot JdbcTemplate test, revealing that sequential primary keys provide superior insert performance and lower index fragmentation.
MySQL officially recommends using auto_increment sequential primary keys instead of UUIDs or non‑sequential snowflake IDs because of performance concerns.
The article creates three tables (user_auto_key, user_uuid, user_random_key) that differ only in the primary key generation strategy and uses a Spring Boot application with JdbcTemplate to insert and query large amounts of data, measuring insert time.
package com.wyq.mysqldemo;
import cn.hutool.core.collection.CollectionUtil;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.databaseobject.UserKeyAuto;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.databaseobject.UserKeyRandom;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.databaseobject.UserKeyUUID;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.diffkeytest.AutoKeyTableService;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.diffkeytest.RandomKeyTableService;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.diffkeytest.UUIDKeyTableService;
import com.wyq.mysqldemo.util.JdbcTemplateService;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.boot.test.context.SpringBootTest;
import org.springframework.util.StopWatch;
import java.util.List;
@SpringBootTest
class MysqlDemoApplicationTests {
@Autowired
private JdbcTemplateService jdbcTemplateService;
@Autowired
private AutoKeyTableService autoKeyTableService;
@Autowired
private UUIDKeyTableService uuidKeyTableService;
@Autowired
private RandomKeyTableService randomKeyTableService;
@Test
void testDBTime() {
StopWatch stopwatch = new StopWatch("执行sql时间消耗");
// auto_increment key task
final String insertSql = "INSERT INTO user_key_auto(user_id,user_name,sex,address,city,email,state) VALUES(?,?,?,?,?,?,?)";
List<UserKeyAuto> insertData = autoKeyTableService.getInsertData();
stopwatch.start("自动生成key表任务开始");
long start1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
if (CollectionUtil.isNotEmpty(insertData)) {
boolean insertResult = jdbcTemplateService.insert(insertSql, insertData, false);
System.out.println(insertResult);
}
long end1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("auto key消耗的时间:" + (end1 - start1));
stopwatch.stop();
// UUID key task
final String insertSql2 = "INSERT INTO user_uuid(id,user_id,user_name,sex,address,city,email,state) VALUES(?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)";
List<UserKeyUUID> insertData2 = uuidKeyTableService.getInsertData();
stopwatch.start("UUID的key表任务开始");
long begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
if (CollectionUtil.isNotEmpty(insertData)) {
boolean insertResult = jdbcTemplateService.insert(insertSql2, insertData2, true);
System.out.println(insertResult);
}
long over = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("UUID key消耗的时间:" + (over - begin));
stopwatch.stop();
// Random long key task
final String insertSql3 = "INSERT INTO user_random_key(id,user_id,user_name,sex,address,city,email,state) VALUES(?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)";
List<UserKeyRandom> insertData3 = randomKeyTableService.getInsertData();
stopwatch.start("随机的long值key表任务开始");
Long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
if (CollectionUtil.isNotEmpty(insertData)) {
boolean insertResult = jdbcTemplateService.insert(insertSql3, insertData3, true);
System.out.println(insertResult);
}
Long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("随机key任务消耗时间:" + (end - start));
stopwatch.stop();
String result = stopwatch.prettyPrint();
System.out.println(result);
}
}Test results show that with 1.3 million existing rows, inserting 100 k new rows the auto_increment key is fastest, the random long key is slower, and UUID is the slowest; the performance gap widens as data volume grows.
The article explains the internal index structures: auto_increment keys are sequential, allowing InnoDB to append rows to the end of pages, minimizing page splits and random I/O, while UUIDs are random, causing page splits, fragmentation, and extra disk reads.
It also discusses drawbacks of auto_increment keys, such as exposing business growth information, lock contention under high concurrency, and the overhead of the auto_increment lock mechanism.
Conclusion: for InnoDB tables, using sequential primary keys yields better insert performance and lower fragmentation, though the choice should consider security and concurrency requirements.
Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.
This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactand we will review it promptly.
Selected Java Interview Questions
A professional Java tech channel sharing common knowledge to help developers fill gaps. Follow us!
How this landed with the community
Was this worth your time?
0 Comments
Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.
