Why Small Pull Requests Boost Code Review Quality: Open‑Source Contribution Best Practices

Provides the author's GitHub address ( https://github.com/JunManYuanLong) and invites contributions via small pull requests, citing research that larger changes reduce review quality and recommending incremental changes.

Emphasizes using standard Markdown for documentation, which improves readability and helps readers digest content more easily.

Advocates polite language such as "please", "thank you", and "sorry" in online communication, and outlines courteous interaction principles: asking good questions, expressing gratitude, and acknowledging shortcomings.

Describes best practices for descriptive commit messages, noting that many projects have specific formats but share common rules; good commits help maintainers trace changes and understand implementation intent.

Notes that having a personal avatar on GitHub (especially a human‑like one) attracts more attention, and that a complete profile—including bio and email—enhances visibility.

Stresses the importance of staying online and responding promptly to issue discussions, as prolonged silence can harm project progress.

Outlines guidelines for writing clear bug reports, mirroring the structure of well‑formed Git commits, and explains how thorough reports contribute to self‑improvement and knowledge sharing.

Highlights the role of a well‑crafted README in open‑source projects, stating that high‑quality documentation reflects respect for users and complements good code.