Cloud Native 9 min read

Why Software Must Evolve: From Monolithic to Microservices and Beyond

This article explores how software development has transformed over the past decade, highlighting the shift from monolithic architectures to service‑oriented, containerized, and microservice models, and explains why improving developer efficiency and experience is the core driver of this evolution.

Huawei Cloud Developer Alliance
Huawei Cloud Developer Alliance
Huawei Cloud Developer Alliance
Why Software Must Evolve: From Monolithic to Microservices and Beyond

What changes have software undergone in the past decade?

While hardware performance has increased a hundredfold, software has expanded its language ecosystem from Basic, Fortran, and C to Java, C#, Python, PHP and hundreds of other languages, alongside emerging technologies such as XaaS, open source, containers, and services.

The main trajectory of software development is to continuously improve development efficiency and developer experience, lower entry barriers, and boost overall software productivity, which in turn fuels open‑source growth and a scale‑out model that contrasts with hardware’s scale‑up approach.

What is embedded software and where is it heading?

Originally, embedded software was tightly coupled with hardware and shipped together with devices. After Linux was ported to embedded environments, the distinction blurred; technically, embedded software now shares the same development stack as PC and server software.

Because the technical gap is minimal, modern embedded development can adopt internet‑software practices such as SDK+IDE for automatic code generation, though adoption remains low due to misconceptions about performance and resource consumption.

Why break the current monolithic software model?

Monolithic software resembles a massive stone: any change—adding a feature or fixing a bug—requires recompiling, testing, and redeploying the entire system, leading to long wait times and tangled dependencies across multiple development groups.

This tangled structure causes extensive waiting for verification and defect fixes, which is a primary source of developer frustration.

From componentization to service‑orientation: what’s the difference?

Componentization provides basic reuse by packaging common functionality into binary components, but it introduces heavy integration overhead and locks products into specific platforms.

Service‑orientation decouples functionality, allowing consumers to use services without managing internal implementations, reducing coupling, and enabling easier replacement and cross‑platform migration.

What are containers and microservices?

Containers are lightweight runtime environments that have existed for decades but gained popularity with Docker, which bundles development and deployment tooling, lowering the barrier to entry and boosting productivity.

Microservices combine the benefits of componentization and service‑orientation: they break applications into small, independently deployable services that can be scaled, updated, and tested in isolation, improving fault isolation and supporting DevOps practices, though they require sophisticated automation for coordination.

Huawei’s wireless tools department is already working on related initiatives.

Original Source

Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.

Sign in to view source
Republication Notice

This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactadmin@besthub.devand we will review it promptly.

Software ArchitectureMicroservicessoftware developmentcontainerization
Huawei Cloud Developer Alliance
Written by

Huawei Cloud Developer Alliance

The Huawei Cloud Developer Alliance creates a tech sharing platform for developers and partners, gathering Huawei Cloud product knowledge, event updates, expert talks, and more. Together we continuously innovate to build the cloud foundation of an intelligent world.

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.