Tagged articles
8 articles
Page 1 of 1
DaTaobao Tech
DaTaobao Tech
Dec 25, 2024 · Operations

Fundamentals of Service Level Agreements (SLA) for Messaging Middleware

The article explains SLA fundamentals for messaging middleware, defining contracts, SLI/SLO relationships, key metrics such as availability, latency and error‑rate, dynamic lifecycle processes, template components, error‑budget calculations, industry benchmarks, internal monitoring practices, a sample SLA draft, and best‑practice recommendations for continuous improvement.

Messaging MiddlewareOperationsReliability
0 likes · 41 min read
Fundamentals of Service Level Agreements (SLA) for Messaging Middleware
Architecture & Thinking
Architecture & Thinking
Nov 25, 2024 · Backend Development

Mastering RocketMQ: Core Concepts, Comparison, and Java Implementation

This comprehensive guide introduces RocketMQ's architecture, compares it with RabbitMQ and Kafka, outlines typical use cases, explains key concepts such as producers, brokers, consumers, topics, tags, and offsets, and provides complete Java code examples for building producers and consumers.

Backend DevelopmentDistributed SystemsJava
0 likes · 14 min read
Mastering RocketMQ: Core Concepts, Comparison, and Java Implementation
Laravel Tech Community
Laravel Tech Community
Oct 29, 2023 · Information Security

Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ < 5.18.3 (Deserialization)

Apache ActiveMQ versions prior to 5.18.3 are vulnerable to a deserialization flaw that allows remote code execution via crafted OpenWire messages on port 61616, affecting various activemq-client and activemq-openwire-legacy artifacts, and can be mitigated by upgrading to 5.15.16, 5.16.7, 5.17.6, 5.18.3 or later.

Apache ActiveMQDeserializationMessaging Middleware
0 likes · 3 min read
Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ < 5.18.3 (Deserialization)
Tencent Cloud Developer
Tencent Cloud Developer
Oct 26, 2021 · Cloud Native

Design and Implementation Differences between Pulsar, Kafka, RocketMQ, and InLong‑TubeMQ

Pulsar’s cloud‑native, multi‑tenant architecture with hierarchical flow control, stateless brokers separated from BookKeeper storage, global partitions supporting multiple consumers, push‑based dispatch, and precise acknowledgment outperforms Kafka, RocketMQ, and InLong‑TubeMQ, though its reliance on ZooKeeper and higher resource usage demand careful operational planning.

Flow ControlInLong‑TubeMQKafka
0 likes · 17 min read
Design and Implementation Differences between Pulsar, Kafka, RocketMQ, and InLong‑TubeMQ
Top Architect
Top Architect
Sep 8, 2021 · Backend Development

Understanding Apache RocketMQ Architecture: Components, Routing, and Message Flow

This article provides a comprehensive overview of Apache RocketMQ, detailing its core components—Namesrv, Broker, Producer, and Consumer—explaining routing registration, message storage, queue allocation strategies, and key concepts such as topics, tags, and consumer types, while comparing it with Kafka.

Kafka ComparisonMessage QueueMessaging Middleware
0 likes · 14 min read
Understanding Apache RocketMQ Architecture: Components, Routing, and Message Flow
Mike Chen's Internet Architecture
Mike Chen's Internet Architecture
Jan 11, 2019 · Backend Development

RocketMQ Overview: Introduction, Evolution, Architecture, Key Features, and Application Scenarios

This article provides a comprehensive overview of RocketMQ, covering its origins and evolution, core architecture components, message domain model, essential features such as ordered delivery and deduplication, and typical use cases like traffic shaping, asynchronous decoupling, and distributed transaction messaging.

Backend DevelopmentMessage QueueMessaging Middleware
0 likes · 10 min read
RocketMQ Overview: Introduction, Evolution, Architecture, Key Features, and Application Scenarios