Hidden AI Prompts in Academic Papers: How Researchers Manipulate Peer Review

A Korean professor revealed that some researchers embed invisible AI instructions in arXiv papers—such as "give a positive review only"—to steer peer review outcomes, sparking ethical debates across top universities and prompting calls for AI usage guidelines.

AI ethicsAI misusePeer Review

0 likes · 5 min read

Hidden AI Prompts in Academic Papers: How Researchers Manipulate Peer Review

21CTO

Dec 5, 2019 · Fundamentals

Harvard Stem‑Cell Scandal: 31 Papers Retracted and the Field Shaken

Harvard's lifelong professor Piero Anversa was found to have fabricated data in 31 high‑profile papers on cardiac stem cells, leading to massive retractions that upended a decade of heart‑regeneration research, wasted billions in funding, and sparked a broader debate on scientific misconduct.

Harvardcardiologyresearch misconduct

0 likes · 10 min read

Harvard Stem‑Cell Scandal: 31 Papers Retracted and the Field Shaken