Tagged articles

reviewer response

6 articles · Page 1 of 1

Responding to Reviewers Who Request Large‑Scale Experiments Unfeasible in Rebuttal

The article explains why simply stating that a large‑scale experiment cannot be done during the rebuttal period is insufficient, and outlines how to detail experiment costs, provide a representative smaller study, and interpret its significance to satisfy reviewers' core concerns.

academic writingexperiment costpaper rebuttal
0 likes · 7 min read
Responding to Reviewers Who Request Large‑Scale Experiments Unfeasible in Rebuttal

How to Effectively Answer Reviewer Concerns About Method Complexity and Computational Overhead

The article outlines why vague claims like "the performance gain justifies the cost" fail to satisfy reviewers, and provides a structured rebuttal framework that details the source, magnitude, and controllability of extra computational overhead, supported by concrete examples and metrics.

academic writingcomputational costmethod complexity
0 likes · 6 min read
How to Effectively Answer Reviewer Concerns About Method Complexity and Computational Overhead

How to Write Winning Rebuttals for NeurIPS: 28 Open‑Source Case Studies

This guide presents 28 curated rebuttal cases covering common reviewer criticisms—such as perceived complexity, lack of novelty, insufficient experiments, and misunderstandings—and offers a structured three‑question framework, detailed response strategies, and an open‑source repository to help researchers craft concise, persuasive replies across top AI conferences.

AI conferencesOpen-sourceacademic writing
0 likes · 6 min read
How to Write Winning Rebuttals for NeurIPS: 28 Open‑Source Case Studies

How to Effectively Address Reviewer Comments on Insufficient Related Work Discussion

The article explains why reviewers criticize a lack of related‑work discussion, shows why a simple promise to add citations is inadequate, and provides a structured rebuttal template that categorizes prior work, clarifies its relation to the paper, and highlights the novel contribution.

academic writingpaper rebuttalrelated work discussion
0 likes · 6 min read
How to Effectively Address Reviewer Comments on Insufficient Related Work Discussion

How to Address Reviewer Comments About Insufficient Theoretical Analysis

The article explains why simply citing strong experimental results does not satisfy reviewers who question a method's theoretical justification, and provides a structured rebuttal strategy that clarifies core mechanisms, underlying assumptions, and the method's applicability limits.

academic writingpaper rebuttalresearch methodology
0 likes · 5 min read
How to Address Reviewer Comments About Insufficient Theoretical Analysis