Achieving 280k QPS with Webman 2.0: 100‑Concurrent Load Test on Ubuntu

This guide walks through setting up an Ubuntu 22.04 server, installing PHP and Composer, deploying the Webman 2.0 framework, and using ApacheBench to issue 100,000 requests with 100 concurrent keep‑alive connections, achieving roughly 280,000 QPS and demonstrating the framework’s high‑throughput performance.

Open Source Tech Hub
Open Source Tech Hub
Open Source Tech Hub
Achieving 280k QPS with Webman 2.0: 100‑Concurrent Load Test on Ubuntu

Introduction: The author performed a real‑world load test of the Webman 2.0 PHP framework on a cloud server, recording a peak throughput of 280,000 queries per second (QPS) under 100 concurrent long‑living connections.

Test Environment

Server: 8‑core (vCPU) 16 GiB RAM, Ubuntu 22.04 64‑bit.

Step 1 – Install Prerequisites

curl -sO https://www.workerman.net/install-php-and-composer && sudo bash install-php-and-composer

Step 2 – Install Webman 2.0

composer create-project workerman/webman:~2.0 webman-2.0

Step 3 – Run ApacheBench Load Test

ab -n100000 -c100 -k http://172.16.0.39:8787/index/index
Parameter details: -n100000 requests total, -c100 concurrent workers, -k enables keep‑alive (long‑connection) mode.

The test generated approximately 280 k QPS, demonstrating Webman 2.0’s capability to handle high‑throughput traffic on modest cloud hardware.

Original Source

Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.

Sign in to view source
Republication Notice

This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactadmin@besthub.devand we will review it promptly.

BackendLoad TestingPHPapachebenchWebman
Open Source Tech Hub
Written by

Open Source Tech Hub

Sharing cutting-edge internet technologies and practical AI resources.

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.