R&D Management 21 min read

Digital Quality Measurement System at Qunar: Building, Implementing, and Operating a Comprehensive R&D Metrics Framework

This article details Qunar's end‑to‑end digital quality measurement system, describing how over 100 indicators were defined, filtered, and organized into a hierarchical model, how the platform ingests and visualizes data, and how continuous governance and PDCA cycles improve system stability and reduce complexity.

Qunar Tech Salon
Qunar Tech Salon
Qunar Tech Salon
Digital Quality Measurement System at Qunar: Building, Implementing, and Operating a Comprehensive R&D Metrics Framework

Qunar built a digital quality measurement system to enable precise monitoring and management of system stability, supporting decision‑making for global stability managers.

The article explains how more than 100 initial metrics were identified, refined to about 60 key indicators, and categorized by measurement object (product, project, application, people), service target (executives, team leads, staff), and measurement method (layered, leveled, classified).

A five‑step implementation path—metric definition, data collection, processing, evaluation, and continuous improvement—guides the rollout, with iterative refinement based on feedback.

The platform architecture consists of a data source layer, a model layer, and a presentation layer, standardizing data formats, aggregating metrics into a data lake, scoring indicators, and providing multi‑level dashboards (global, project, application) for trend, comparison, clustering, and drill‑down analysis.

Governance combines team collaboration and PDCA‑style processes: a digital governance committee sets quarterly goals, tracks metric changes, rewards improvements, and reports to senior management, while monthly data reviews drive corrective actions.

Beyond quality, the system addresses software decay by defining a complexity model that measures static attributes (code size, cyclomatic complexity) and call attributes (internal/external dependencies), normalizing values to a 0‑10 scale and weighting them appropriately.

Practical outcomes include reduced fault rates (from 0.57% to ~0.2%), 100% quality gate activation, full coverage of core system stress testing, and a long‑term governance mechanism that caps annual complexity growth at 10% and triggers alerts when thresholds are exceeded.

The article concludes with future plans to integrate AI for predictive analysis, enhance training, and expand automated fault‑drill exercises.

Original Source

Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.

Sign in to view source
Republication Notice

This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactadmin@besthub.devand we will review it promptly.

system stabilityR&D metricscomplexity managementdigital measurementquality governance
Qunar Tech Salon
Written by

Qunar Tech Salon

Qunar Tech Salon is a learning and exchange platform for Qunar engineers and industry peers. We share cutting-edge technology trends and topics, providing a free platform for mid-to-senior technical professionals to exchange and learn.

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.