How to Efficiently Retrieve Top‑N Rows per Group in a Pandas DataFrame
This article demonstrates several practical techniques—including sorting before grouping, using drop_duplicates, and leveraging NumPy stacking—to extract the top N rows for each group in a pandas DataFrame, compares their performance, and provides a reusable function for custom use.
Rescuing pandas (5) – Getting Top‑N rows per DataFrame group
Many users avoid pandas for group‑by top‑N tasks; this series shows how to make pandas attractive again.
Data requirement
Given a DataFrame, we need to group by name, sort by date_col, and retrieve the first N rows of each group.
We use a small‑scale dataset to compare execution times of different approaches.
Requirement breakdown
DataFrames provide head() and tail() for the first/last rows. After groupby, applying head() yields the first rows of each group, but to get top‑N we must sort the DataFrame first.
Solution approaches
Method 1 – Sort then group
Sort the entire DataFrame before grouping, then use groupby(...).head(N). This can be done either by sorting first or by sorting within each group using apply.
Sort first, then group
df.sort_values(['name', 'date_col'], inplace=True)
df.groupby(['name']).head(1)Group first, then sort
Since groupby cannot be followed directly by sort_values, we use apply to sort each group.
df.groupby(['name']).apply(lambda x: x.sort_values('date_col').head(1)).reset_index(drop=True)The timing difference is an order of magnitude; the slowdown is caused mainly by apply, not by sort_values.
Method 2 – Use drop_duplicates
When only the first row per group is needed, drop_duplicates(['name']) (default keeps the first) works efficiently after sorting.
df.sort_values(['name', 'date_col'], inplace=True)
df.drop_duplicates(['name']) # keeps first by defaultMethod 3 – No groupby (using counts and NumPy)
We can achieve the same result by counting occurrences with value_counts, generating a range for each group, and stacking the results with np.hstack. The generated rank array is then used to filter the original sorted DataFrame.
import numpy as np
df.sort_values(['name', 'date_col'], inplace=True)
name_count = df.value_counts('name', sort=False)
rank = np.hstack(name_count.map(lambda x: range(x)).values)
df = df[rank < k]Encapsulated as a reusable function:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
def get_data_top(data: pd.DataFrame, group_cols: list, val_cols: list, ascending: bool = True, k: int = 1):
"""Return top‑k rows per group.
Parameters
----------
data: DataFrame
group_cols: columns to group by
val_cols: columns to sort by
ascending: sort order
k: number of rows per group
"""
datac = data.reset_index().copy()
index_colname = datac.columns[0]
datac.sort_values(group_cols + val_cols, ascending=ascending, inplace=True)
rank0 = np.hstack(datac.value_counts(group_cols, sort=False).map(lambda x: range(x)).values)
datac = datac[rank0 < k]
datac.index = datac[index_colname].values
del datac[index_colname]
return datacConclusion
Three methods achieve the same top‑N extraction; sorting before grouping is generally the fastest, while apply introduces significant overhead. The NumPy‑based approach offers comparable performance and can be wrapped into a convenient function.
Embrace experimentation and create efficient data‑processing pipelines.
Python Crawling & Data Mining
Life's short, I code in Python. This channel shares Python web crawling, data mining, analysis, processing, visualization, automated testing, DevOps, big data, AI, cloud computing, machine learning tools, resources, news, technical articles, tutorial videos and learning materials. Join us!
How this landed with the community
Was this worth your time?
0 Comments
Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.
