Implementing Distributed Locks with Redis and Zookeeper

This article explains the concept of distributed locks and provides step‑by‑step implementations using Redis's SET command with NX/EX options and Zookeeper's persistent and sequential znodes, including lock acquisition, release, and failure handling.

ITPUB
ITPUB
ITPUB
Implementing Distributed Locks with Redis and Zookeeper

1. Redis‑Based Distributed Lock Implementation

Redis is a key‑value NoSQL store often used for caching. Starting from Redis v2.6.12, the SET command supports atomic options:

SET key value [EX seconds] [PX milliseconds] [NX|XX]

EX sets an expiration time, while NX ensures the key is set only if it does not already exist – the core mechanism for a Redis lock.

Typical lock acquisition scenarios:

Node A obtains the key with an expiration; if it crashes before releasing, the expiration automatically frees the lock.

If a node crashes before setting the expiration, the atomic SET … NX EX fails and returns 0, preventing a lock from being acquired.

2. Releasing the Lock

To avoid non‑atomic release, a Lua script is commonly used because the script runs atomically, similar to a transaction. The article includes an illustration of such a script (see image).

2. Zookeeper‑Based Distributed Lock Implementation

Zookeeper provides distributed coordination via znodes. There are four znode types:

Persistent node : remains after the client disconnects.

Persistent sequential node : created with an automatically incremented suffix based on creation order.

Ephemeral node : deleted when the client session ends.

Ephemeral sequential node : combines sequential naming with automatic deletion on session loss.

Lock acquisition using these nodes follows these steps:

Create a persistent parent node (if not existing). When a client wants a lock, it creates an ephemeral sequential child under this parent.

All clients list the sequential children, sort them, and the client whose node has the smallest sequence number obtains the lock.

If a client’s node is not the smallest, it registers a watcher on the next‑smaller node to be notified when that node disappears, indicating the lock may become available.

The article illustrates the process with three clients (Client1, Client2, Client3) showing how each creates a sequential node, checks ordering, and either acquires the lock or watches the predecessor.

2. Releasing the Lock

Because the lock is represented by an ephemeral sequential node, it is automatically removed when the client finishes its task or crashes, freeing the lock for others.

Original Source

Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.

Sign in to view source
Republication Notice

This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactadmin@besthub.devand we will review it promptly.

BackendZooKeeperdistributed-lock
ITPUB
Written by

ITPUB

Official ITPUB account sharing technical insights, community news, and exciting events.

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.