Tagged articles

10 articles

Page 1 of 1

Apr 25, 2026 · Artificial Intelligence

AI Review Pilot at AAAI-26: 22,977 Papers Processed in 24 Hours, Accuracy Outperforms Human Reviewers

The AAAI‑26 AI Review Pilot deployed a multi‑stage GPT‑5‑based system to generate full‑text reviews for 22,977 submissions within a day at a cost of less than $1 per paper, and a large‑scale survey showed reviewers rated the AI feedback higher than human reviews on six of nine quality dimensions.

AAAI-26AIPeer Review

0 likes · 25 min read

AI Review Pilot at AAAI-26: 22,977 Papers Processed in 24 Hours, Accuracy Outperforms Human Reviewers

SuanNi

Mar 26, 2026 · Artificial Intelligence

Can AI Fully Automate Scientific Research? Inside the ‘AI Scientist’ Breakthrough

A Nature‑published study introduces “The AI Scientist,” a system that autonomously generates research ideas, designs and runs experiments, writes a full paper, and even self‑reviews, achieving the first AI‑only submission to pass ICLR peer review with a score above the acceptance threshold.

AILarge Language ModelsPeer Review

0 likes · 14 min read

Can AI Fully Automate Scientific Research? Inside the ‘AI Scientist’ Breakthrough

PaperAgent

Mar 21, 2026 · Artificial Intelligence

Can Peer Review Boost Large Language Model Ensembles? Introducing LLM‑PeerReview

This article analyzes the unsupervised LLM‑PeerReview framework, which uses a peer‑review inspired scoring, reasoning, and selection pipeline—including a novel flipped‑triple scoring trick—to combine multiple large language models and achieve significant performance gains over existing ensemble and collaboration baselines.

Artificial IntelligenceFlipped Triple ScoringLLM Ensemble

0 likes · 11 min read

Can Peer Review Boost Large Language Model Ensembles? Introducing LLM‑PeerReview

Machine Learning Algorithms & Natural Language Processing

Mar 15, 2026 · Artificial Intelligence

630‑Line Autoresearch Generates 81 Agents, 2,300 Experiments and Ten Pre‑training Insights

A 630‑line Python Autoresearch project sparked a community‑run distributed system that created over 80 autonomous AI agents, executed more than 2,300 experiments in four days, self‑organized roles and peer‑review, and uncovered ten concrete pre‑training findings.

AI agentsAutoResearchDistributed Training

0 likes · 9 min read

630‑Line Autoresearch Generates 81 Agents, 2,300 Experiments and Ten Pre‑training Insights

Data Party THU

Sep 20, 2025 · Artificial Intelligence

How DeepSeek Trained a $30M LLM for Just $29.4K – Inside the R1 Model

The article reports that DeepSeek’s R1 large language model, detailed in a peer‑reviewed Nature paper, was built with roughly $300 k in total cost—about $29.4 k for training—using Nvidia H800 chips and novel pure reinforcement‑learning techniques, achieving competitive performance while remaining open‑source.

DeepSeekNvidia H800Peer Review

0 likes · 9 min read

How DeepSeek Trained a $30M LLM for Just $29.4K – Inside the R1 Model

HyperAI Super Neural

Sep 18, 2025 · Artificial Intelligence

DeepSeek‑R1 Costs $294K to Train, Hits Nature Cover as First Peer‑Reviewed Large Model

DeepSeek‑R1, the first mainstream large language model to pass peer review in Nature, was trained for $294,000 using 648 H800 GPUs, and its RL‑enhanced version, DeepSeek‑R1‑Zero, achieved up to 86.7% pass@1 on AIME 2024, outperforming human averages across math, coding, and science tasks.

AI researchDeepSeek-R1Peer Review

0 likes · 10 min read

DeepSeek‑R1 Costs $294K to Train, Hits Nature Cover as First Peer‑Reviewed Large Model

DataFunTalk

Jul 8, 2025 · Artificial Intelligence

Hidden Prompt Scandal: How AI Was Coerced to Give Positive Paper Reviews

A recent controversy reveals that a research team embedded a hidden prompt in a paper to force AI reviewers to give only positive feedback, sparking intense debate about academic integrity, AI ethics, and the need for stricter peer‑review policies.

AI ethicsPeer Reviewacademic misconduct

0 likes · 9 min read

Hidden Prompt Scandal: How AI Was Coerced to Give Positive Paper Reviews

DataFunTalk

Jul 7, 2025 · Artificial Intelligence

Hidden AI Prompts in Academic Papers: How Researchers Manipulate Peer Review

A Korean professor revealed that some researchers embed invisible AI instructions in arXiv papers—such as "give a positive review only"—to steer peer review outcomes, sparking ethical debates across top universities and prompting calls for AI usage guidelines.

AI ethicsAI misusePeer Review

0 likes · 5 min read

Hidden AI Prompts in Academic Papers: How Researchers Manipulate Peer Review

Programmer DD

May 10, 2022 · Fundamentals

Why Were 323 Papers From a Fake Conference Retracted?

A massive retraction occurred when ACM withdrew 323 papers that were published under the guise of the ICIMTech 2021 conference, revealing a fraudulent operation that involved fabricated peer reviews, Chinese authors from various institutions, and highlighted recurring issues with paper‑mill practices.

Peer Reviewacademic misconductconference fraud

0 likes · 6 min read

Why Were 323 Papers From a Fake Conference Retracted?

Architect

Oct 14, 2015 · R&D Management

Architects Should Code: Debunking the Ivory‑Tower Misconception

The article argues that software architects must stay hands‑on—coding, pairing, reviewing, and rotating with delivery teams—to gather timely feedback, exercise effective technical leadership, and avoid the isolated "ivory tower" that hampers agile, high‑quality system development.

Peer ReviewSoftware Architecturecoding

0 likes · 12 min read

Architects Should Code: Debunking the Ivory‑Tower Misconception