Fundamentals 8 min read

Direct Reprogramming Resets Epigenetic Age in Human Cells Over 50 Days

University of Bonn researchers directly reprogrammed human blood cells from donors aged 0–101 into induced neural stem cells using SOX2 and cMYC, finding epigenetic age dropped to ~13% of donor age at early passages and ~5% later, with age-related DNA methylation marks resetting gradually over ~50 days independent of cell proliferation.

Data Party THU
Data Party THU
Data Party THU
Direct Reprogramming Resets Epigenetic Age in Human Cells Over 50 Days

Study Overview

Researchers from University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, and RWTH Aachen University published a study in Aging Cell (October 3, 2026) investigating direct reprogramming of human blood cells into induced neural stem cells (iNSCs) and tracking epigenetic age changes.

Methodology

The study included 15 donors aged from newborn to 101 years. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were first differentiated into erythroid progenitor cells (EPCs). Using Sendai virus vectors, the transcription factors SOX2 and cMYC were transiently overexpressed to convert EPCs into proliferative neural stem cells, bypassing the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) stage.

Figure: CD71-positive EPCs can be programmed into DACH1-expressing NSCs in less than two weeks.
Figure: CD71-positive EPCs can be programmed into DACH1-expressing NSCs in less than two weeks.

Epigenetic Age Reversal

DNA methylation age was assessed using the Horvath 2018 clock. Original EPCs showed DNA methylation age highly correlated with donor chronological age. After reprogramming, low-passage iNSCs exhibited a methylation age averaging ~13% of donor age, which further decreased to ~5% at higher passages.

Temporal Dynamics of Age Reset

Time-series analysis of three cell lines from donors aged 50–101 revealed that most age-related DNA methylation features required approximately 50 days to gradually reset. Neural lineage markers DACH1 and PAX6 were expressed by day 12, but full neural stem cell identity, as assessed by DNA methylation and RNA sequencing, continued to mature over several weeks (at least until day 26 post-conversion).

Figure: Heritable rejuvenation is a slow process, and regulation of stem cell proliferation has little effect on it.
Figure: Heritable rejuvenation is a slow process, and regulation of stem cell proliferation has little effect on it.

Independence from Cell Proliferation

To test whether epigenetic rejuvenation merely reflects selection of younger cells through proliferation, the researchers slowed division using glycerol and thymidine. Despite reduced population doublings, DNA methylation age continued to decline similarly to untreated controls. Additionally, differentiation toward neurons via NGN2 induction for ~20 days did not alter methylation age relative to proliferating controls, indicating that epigenetic youthening does not require ongoing cell division.

Figure: Epigenetic and transcriptomic integration of neural stem cell (NSC) identity is a prolonged process, lasting at least until day 26 post-conversion.
Figure: Epigenetic and transcriptomic integration of neural stem cell (NSC) identity is a prolonged process, lasting at least until day 26 post-conversion.

Functional Validation in Oldest Donors

Mature iNSC lines from 87- and 101-year-old donors showed no typical age-related abnormalities in nuclear lamina, autophagy, mitochondrial function, or cellular senescence markers, providing orthogonal support for the methylation clock findings.

Implications and Limitations

The model enables observation of stepwise molecular changes during reprogramming over weeks, offering a platform to test factors that accelerate or decelerate epigenetic aging. Potential applications include studying age-related neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's. However, the authors caution that DNA methylation age is a surrogate biomarker, not equivalent to overall functional cellular age. Reference data for truly aged neural stem cells are lacking, so the influence of cell identity conversion on age estimation cannot be fully excluded. The in vitro findings do not demonstrate reversal of organismal aging.

Paper link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acel.70751 ScienceDaily coverage: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/10/261020085013.htm

Code example

来源:ScienceAI
本文
约2000字
,建议阅读
5
分钟
研究发现直接细胞编程伴随持续性的年龄相关分子变化。
Original Source

Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.

Sign in to view source
Republication Notice

This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactadmin@besthub.devand we will review it promptly.

cellular rejuvenationcMYCdirect reprogrammingDNA methylationepigenetic agingHorvath clockinduced neural stem cellsSOX2
Data Party THU
Written by

Data Party THU

Official platform of Tsinghua Big Data Research Center, sharing the team's latest research, teaching updates, and big data news.

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.