R&D Management 5 min read

TOGAF 10 Architecture Board Duties & Huawei's Multi-Level Governance Model

This article outlines the TOGAF 10 Architecture Board's key responsibilities — ensuring sub-architecture consistency, component reuse, compliance, and cross-boundary decision escalation — and details how Huawei operationalizes these principles through a layered governance structure comprising the Enterprise Architecture Committee, Transformation Steering Committee, Project Office, and Requirements & Architecture Management Teams to align local changes with corporate strategy.

Architecture Practice Methods
Architecture Practice Methods
Architecture Practice Methods
TOGAF 10 Architecture Board Duties & Huawei's Multi-Level Governance Model

TOGAF 10 Architecture Board Responsibilities

In TOGAF 10, the Architecture Board is a cross-organizational body primarily responsible for overseeing the implementation of architecture strategy — i.e., enforcing architecture governance. The board typically pursues the following objectives:

Provide a basis for all architecture-related decisions

Consistency across sub-architectures

Establish component reuse targets

Enterprise architecture flexibility:

Meet changing business needs

Leverage new technology

Enforce architecture compliance

Improve the maturity of the architecture discipline within the organization

Ensure adoption of architecture-based development principles

Support visible escalation capability for cross-boundary decisions

TOGAF 10 Architecture Board responsibilities diagram
TOGAF 10 Architecture Board responsibilities diagram

Huawei's Architecture Governance Practice

Both Huawei Data Way and Huawei Digital Transformation Way mention the Enterprise Architecture Committee (EAC), but do not describe its governance mechanics in detail. The following synthesis is based on publicly available materials and represents the author's personal view.

Huawei's architecture governance extends beyond the headquarters EAC to include multiple architecture teams: the Transformation Project Office (PO), Business Transformation and IT Management Teams (3Ts), and Requirements and Architecture Management Teams (RAMTs). Through collaboration among these multi-level teams, Huawei prevents local architecture changes from failing to connect with overall strategy.

Huawei multi-level architecture governance structure
Huawei multi-level architecture governance structure

In cooperation with the Transformation Steering Committee (ESC) and the Transformation Project Office (PO), the EAC provides architectural support and assurance for business and technology transformations. For example, when introducing new technologies, adjusting business models, or conducting mergers and acquisitions, the EAC ensures these transformations align with the existing architecture strategy while driving architectural adjustments to support the enterprise's new direction.

The Requirements and Architecture Management Teams (RAMTs) are responsible for embedding EAC's architecture decisions and principles into concrete project execution. They act as a bridge between the EAC and project teams, ensuring projects follow the established architecture strategy from initiation to delivery.

Architecture issues or conflicts encountered by project teams during execution can be fed back to the EAC via the RAMTs for resolution, ensuring projects proceed smoothly while remaining compliant with architecture requirements.

Reference: TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Board
Original Source

Signed-in readers can open the original source through BestHub's protected redirect.

Sign in to view source
Republication Notice

This article has been distilled and summarized from source material, then republished for learning and reference. If you believe it infringes your rights, please contactadmin@besthub.devand we will review it promptly.

Architecture GovernanceEnterprise ArchitectureHuaweiTOGAF 10Architecture BoardArchitecture ComplianceEACMulti-level Governance
Architecture Practice Methods
Written by

Architecture Practice Methods

Frontline architect. Sharing knowledge and insights in enterprise architecture.

0 followers
Reader feedback

How this landed with the community

Sign in to like

Rate this article

Was this worth your time?

Sign in to rate
Discussion

0 Comments

Thoughtful readers leave field notes, pushback, and hard-won operational detail here.